PAUL GRAHAMS ESSAY HOW TO DISAGREE
In his words and from his essay, How to Disagree:. Width Height An eloquent speaker or writer can give the impression of vanquishing an opponent merely by using forceful words. An eloquent speaker or writer can give the impression of vanquishing an opponent merely by using forceful words. Essay subjects range from “Beating the Averages”,  which compares Lisp to other programming languages and introduced the hypothetical programming language Blub , to “Why Nerds are Unpopular”,  a discussion of nerd life in high school.
It matters much more whether the author is wrong or right than what his tone is. Forms up to this point can usually be ignored as proving nothing. YCombinator , Hacker News. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: Wikiquote has quotations related to: Soviet influence on the peace movement User:
Archived from the original on 13 March The following 35 pages uses this file: Zooming out and seeing his current position on the disagreement hierarchy may inspire him to try moving up to counterargument or refutation. Twenty years ago, writers wrote and readers read. Unless the opposing argument actually depends on such things, the only purpose of correcting them is to discredit one’s opponent.
File:Graham’s Hierarchy of – Wikimedia Commons
Do they use scripture? Even as high as DH5 we still sometimes see deliberate dishonesty, as when someone picks out minor points of an argument and refutes those. Agreeing tends to motivate people less than disagreeing.
Retrieved 6 March And I truly appreciate uow real people. This diagram was created with a text editor. Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Wikipedia: English programmer, venture capitalist, and essayist. The next level up we start to see responses to the writing, rather than the writer.
Thanks to Trevor Blackwell and Jessica Livingston for reading drafts of this. Most intellectual dishonesty is unintentional.
Disagreeing with “How to Disagree”
The force of a refutation depends on what you refute. He later gained fame for his essays, which he posts to his personal website, paulgraham.
You don’t have to be mean when you have a real point to make. But it’s important to realize that more articulate name-calling has just as little weight. Public domain Public domain false false.
Paul Graham (programmer)
Michael the Brave Talk: Permission Reusing this file. YCombinatorHacker News.
Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. If there’s something wrong with the senator’s argument, you should say what it is; and if there isn’t, what difference does it make that he’s a senator? Many who respond to something disagree with esday.
If you have something real to say, being mean just gets in the way. Sometimes the spirit in which this is done makes it more of a sophisticated form of ad hominem than actual refutation.
How to Disagree
Retrieved 2 May Often, at least in my experience, the answer is yes. If moving up the disagreement hierarchy makes people less mean, that will make most of them happier. It might actually carry some weight. Refuting the Central Point. If moving up the disagreement hierarchy makes people less mean, that will make most of them happier.